My Story

My name is Liisa Speaker…

Why did I become an attorney?

I wanted to make a difference in the world. I didn’t know my calling would be family law and child-related cases for quite some time. As a high school student, I competed at the state and national levels for the National History Fair. The year I won third place at the national competition my project was about a United States Supreme Court case, Brown v Mississippi. In that case, three black men in Mississippi were accused of murdering a white man. Through the use of violence, the police were able to secure confessions from the three men. Within one week of the murder, the trio had been arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced to death by hanging. The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. This case triggered a trend in the United States Supreme Court of recognizing procedural due process rights of criminal defendants. The Supreme Court held that these defendants were denied due process of law.

When I applied to law school many years later, I was focused on justice for those who don’t have a voice, by using a pragmatic approach – finding ways to get results.  This led me to a career as an appellate attorney. My clients want their voice heard. And frequently by the time they find us, they feel like they have not been heard in a very long time - particularly when the trial judge rules against them in a spectacularly wrong way. I fight for my clients on appeal to give them a voice in the process so their voices can be heard.


What is my favorite thing about being an attorney?

I get a thrill from explaining the law to judges and convincing them to follow the law (and then rule in my client’s favor!) I also enjoy helping colleagues better represent their clients, especially in raising due process violations and other issues where there is a risk that the judge won’t follow the law. It is basically teaching the law to judges and attorneys, but with the goal of actually making a difference in someone’s life.

A quote I love.

“Big doors swing on small hinges”

-W. Clement Stone

Appellate Attorney

Since graduating from The University of Texas School of Law, one of the nation’s top law schools, I have become well known for my excellent written and oral advocacy. I opened the only appellate boutique law firm in Michigan in 2007 and have since helped clients obtain victories in appeals ranging from custody disputes to no-fault automobile insurance litigation to real property cases and to probate appeals.

But in the past five years, I have focused my appellate practice on family law, adoption, and child welfare cases. I am a fellow in the American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys, an elite group of family law attorneys and I serve as an officer for the State Bar of Michigan’s Family Law Section.

Awards/Recognitions:

  • 2021 Leo A. Farhat Outstanding Attorney Award, from the Ingham County Bar Association

  • 2018 Respected Advocated Award, from by the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel

  • 2014 Top 30 Women in the Law, from Michigan Lawyers Weekly

  • 2009 Distinguished Brief Award, from the Cooley Law School Law Review for amicus brief on behalf of Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault in USF&G v Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association.

  • 1999 Outstanding Note Award from The Review of Litigation for note on Ethical Considerations in Preparing Witnesses for Depositions & Trial.

  • 1997 Best Brief Award, selected by staff attorneys at the Texas Supreme Court, while in law school.

Published Family Law Opinions:

Baby Boy Doe (On Remand), __ Mich App __ (2022). 

Baby Boy Doe, __ Mich ___; 975 NW2d 486 (2022), reversing 338 Mich App 571 (2021). 

Kostreva v Kostreva, 337 Mich App 648; 976 NW2d 889 (2021). 

Bofysil v Bofysil, 332 Mich App 232; 956 NW2d 544 (2020).  

Martin v Martin, 331 Mich App 224; 952 NW2d 530 (2020). 

In re AGD, 327 Mich App 332 (2019).

Pennington v Pennington, 329 Mich App 562 (2019).

In re MGR, ­­­323 Mich App 279 (2018).

In re Miller Minors, 322 Mich App 497 (2018).

In re MJG, 320 Mich App 310 (2017).

In re JSP/In re BPG, 320 Mich App 338 (2017).

O’Leary v O’Leary, 321 Mich App 647 (2017).

Geering v King, 320 Mich App 182 (2017).

Elahham v Al Jabban, 319 Mich App 112 (2017).

Allard v Allard, 318 Mich App 853 (2017) (Amicus curiae).

Lieberman v Orr, 319 Mich App 68 (2017).

Yachcik v Yachcik, 319 Mich App 24 (2017).

Bowling v McCarrick, 318 Mich App 568 (2017).

Glaubius v Glaubius, 306 Mich App 157 (2014).

Rose v Rose, 289 Mich App 45 (2010).

Coppess v Attwood, 278 Mich App 415 (2008)

In the Matter of Steven Zimmerman, Minor, 277 Mich App 470 (2008), rev’d in part 480 Mich 1143 (2008).